Current:Home > ScamsHow did each Supreme Court justice vote in today's student loan forgiveness ruling? Here's a breakdown -FundCenter
How did each Supreme Court justice vote in today's student loan forgiveness ruling? Here's a breakdown
View
Date:2025-04-16 17:48:06
The Supreme Court decided 6-3 that the Biden administration does not have the authority to wipe out nearly half-a-trillion dollars in student debt.
The decision denies relief to about 40 million Americans who stood to have up to $20,000 in student debt erased by the plan using the HEROES Act.
There were actually two student loan forgiveness decisions made on Friday: The first was about whether two private citizens had the right to challenge the plan. The court unanimously said that the pair did not have standing, and their challenge was thrown out.
- Read the full text of the decision
However, in the case where the decision to strike down the forgiveness plan was made, the court said that Missouri — one of six states that challenged the plan — did have legal standing. This allowed the court to consider whether the secretary of education could use the HEROES Act to forgive student loan debt.
Here's how the court voted on that case.
Supreme Court justices who voted against student loan forgiveness
The Supreme Court's decision fell along ideological lines, much like Thursday's decision to end race-based affirmative action.
Chief Justice John Roberts voted against the student loan forgiveness plan and delivered the majority opinion, saying that U.S. Education Secretary Miguel Cardona has the authority to "waive or modify" the HEROES Act, but not "rewrite that statute from the ground up."
"The Secretary's comprehensive debt cancellation plan cannot fairly be called a waiver—it not only nullifies existing provisions, but augments and expands them dramatically. It cannot be mere modification, because it constitutes 'effectively the introduction of a whole new regime,'" Roberts wrote.
Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett voted with Roberts.
Barrett filed a concurring opinion, writing that the court "can uphold the Secretary of Education's loan cancellation program only if he points to 'clear congressional authorization' for it."
Supreme Court justices who voted to uphold student loan forgiveness
The court's three liberal voices — Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson — all opposed the decision. Kagan filed a dissent where she called the decision to take up the case, let alone vote on it, an "overreach."
"The plaintiffs in this case are six States that have no personal stake in the Secretary's loan forgiveness plan," Kagan wrote. "They are classic ideological plaintiffs: They think the plan a very bad idea, but they are no worse off because the Secretary differs. In giving those States a forum — in adjudicating their complaint — the Court forgets its proper role. The Court acts as though it is an arbiter of political and policy disputes, rather than of cases and controversies."
In the dissent, Kagan wrote that Cardona acted within the "broad authority" provided by the HEROES Act, saying that the decision to alter usual rules "fits comfortably within" the parameters set by the statute.
Melissa Quinn contributed to this report.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Sonia Sotomayor
- Clarence Thomas
- Student Debt
- Student Loan
- Student Loans
- Ketanji Brown Jackson
- Miguel Cardona
- John Roberts
Kerry Breen is a news editor and reporter for CBS News. Her reporting focuses on current events, breaking news and substance use.
veryGood! (95137)
Related
- The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
- Financier buys Jeffrey Epstein's private islands, with plans to create a resort
- Dealers still sell Hyundais and Kias vulnerable to theft, but insurance is hard to get
- Little Miss Sunshine's Alan Arkin Dead at 89
- $73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
- Love Island’s Ekin-Su Cülcüloğlu and Davide Sanclimenti Break Up
- Cooling Pajamas Under $38 to Ditch Sweaty Summer Nights
- Why zoos can't buy or sell animals
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- This Foot Mask with 50,000+ 5 Star Reviews on Amazon Will Knock the Dead Skin Right Off Your Feet
Ranking
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- The U.S. could run out of cash to pay its bills by June 1, Yellen warns Congress
- Global Warming Drove a Deadly Burst of Indian Ocean Tropical Storms
- Pregnant Lindsay Lohan Shares New Selfie as She Celebrates Her 37th Birthday
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- Warming Trends: How Hairdressers Are Mobilizing to Counter Climate Change, Plus Polar Bears in Greenland and the ‘Sounds of the Ocean’
- Lack of Loggers Is Hobbling Arizona Forest-Thinning Projects That Could Have Slowed This Year’s Devastating Wildfires
- Hurricane Michael Hit the Florida Panhandle in 2018 With 155 MPH Winds. Some Black and Low-Income Neighborhoods Still Haven’t Recovered
Recommendation
'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
SpaceX wants this supersized rocket to fly. But will investors send it to the Moon?
Pull Up a Seat for Jennifer Lawrence's Chicken Shop Date With Amelia Dimoldenberg
McDonald's franchises face more than $200,000 in fines for child-labor law violations
Jorge Ramos reveals his final day with 'Noticiero Univision': 'It's been quite a ride'
Warming Trends: Carbon-Neutral Concrete, Climate-Altered Menus and Olympic Skiing in Vanuatu
Indian Court Rules That Nature Has Legal Status on Par With Humans—and That Humans Are Required to Protect It
Despite mass layoffs, there are still lots of jobs out there. Here's where