Current:Home > ContactSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -FundCenter
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
View
Date:2025-04-15 18:54:31
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (57)
Related
- From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
- Cam'ron slams CNN during live Diddy interview with Abby Phillip: 'Who booked me for this?'
- Graceland is not for sale, Elvis Presley’s granddaughter Riley Keough says in lawsuit
- ICC prosecutor applies for arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Hamas leaders
- Paige Bueckers vs. Hannah Hidalgo highlights women's basketball games to watch
- Solo climber found dead after fall from Denali, highest mountain peak in North America
- U.S. troops will complete their withdrawal from Niger by mid-September, the Pentagon says
- Kids often fear 'ugly and creepy' cicadas. Teachers know how to change their minds.
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Review: Stephen King knows 'You Like It Darker' and obliges with sensational new tales
Ranking
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- Republicans Ted Cruz and Katie Britt introduce bill to protect IVF access
- See Dwayne Johnson transform into Mark Kerr in first photo from biopic 'The Smashing Machine'
- 20 book-to-screen adaptations in 2024: ‘Bridgerton,’ ‘It Ends With Us,’ ’Wicked,’ more
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- Save 50% on Thousands of Target Items, 70% on Kate Spade, 70% on Gap, 60% on J.Crew & Memorial Day Deals
- Panera's Charged Lemonade cited in lawsuit over teen's cardiac arrest
- How many points did Caitlin Clark score last night? Ankle injury, technical foul in loss
Recommendation
Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
Bachelor Nation's Rachel Nance Details Receiving Racist Comments on Social Media
EPA urges water utilities to protect nation's drinking water amid heightened cyberattacks
Jennifer Lopez Briefly Brings Up Ben Affleck Amid Split Rumors
Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
Catholic diocesan hermit approved by Kentucky bishop comes out as transgender
Untangling Zac Brown and Kelly Yazdi’s Brief Marriage and Complicated Breakup
ICC prosecutor applies for arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Hamas leaders